Published by Aloto Naga | July 7, 2025
Kohima, July 7: The NSCN/GPRN has issued a formal clarification regarding recent media reports linking its member General Niki Sumi to a money laundering case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). The group refuted the allegations, calling them misleading and based on outdated incidents that were already legally resolved.
The controversy stems from a 2017 incident at a mobile vehicle checkpoint near Karong in Manipur, where the Assam Rifles intercepted a vehicle and seized a sum of ₹15.59 lakh. The money was reportedly intended for the celebration of the 25th wedding anniversary of Mrs. Shelly Sumi and Gen. Niki Sumi in Taga, Myanmar. Also Read Proclamation Issued Against Niki Sumi President NSCN K
Following the seizure, the case was transferred to the Manipur Police and subsequently brought before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Senapati. After reviewing the documentation, including sale deeds and a Zima bond, the court ruled in favor of Mrs. Shelly Sumi on May 9, 2017. The judgment confirmed the funds were from the sale of family-owned land and were not linked to any unlawful activity.
Our Network
The court order, signed by Chief Judicial Magistrate Wisdom Kamodang, clearly states that the money was returned to the petitioner after all documents were verified and the origin of the funds deemed legitimate.
Despite this legal conclusion, the issue resurfaced in media narratives alleging that Gen. Niki Sumi was an “absconder” under a PMLA case. The NSCN/GPRN criticized the media coverage, accusing Indian agencies of using propaganda to undermine the peace process and discredit Naga leadership.
While the NSCN/GPRN reiterated that Gen. Niki Sumi was never charged or arrested for money laundering, they questioned the Government of India’s intentions behind the timing and tone of the renewed allegations. However, the judiciary’s handling of the case in 2017 reflects procedural integrity and due diligence, reinforcing the importance of legal recourse in clarifying such matters.
The clarification also highlighted broader concerns about the use of pressure tactics in the Indo-Naga peace process. The NSCN/GPRN stated that the policy of “carrot and stick” will not weaken the Naga political struggle, which they say is rooted in history.
Nevertheless, it is worth noting that the Government of India, despite the complexities and mistrust, continues to engage with Naga political groups as part of its broader commitment to peace in the Northeast. The legal resolution of the 2017 incident demonstrates that the Indian judiciary remains open to fair adjudication when provided with proper documentation and evidence.
