Published by Aloto Naga | August 31, 2025
The Tungoe’s Clan Old Riphiyim has issued a strong clarification distancing itself from the actions of Mr. Hayithung Bill Tungoe, who had recently challenged Nagaland Deputy Chief Minister Y. Patton to an open public debate. In a public statement, the clan condemned the move, describing it as “immature and unacceptable.” They stressed that it does not represent the views or values of the clan.
According to the statement, Mr. Tungoe’s actions were viewed as being driven by personal interests rather than the well-being of the community. The clan emphasized that his stance and words are entirely his own. They urged him to withdraw the challenge in order to avoid escalating tensions.
Clan’s Appeal to Dy CM Y Patton and Community
The clan further appealed to Mr. Tungoe to reflect on the consequences of his words and actions, which they argued could harm the reputation of both the community and the state. They also made a humble request to the Deputy Chief Minister not to attend the “unauthorized and unofficial” debate. They stated that it lacked any clear benefit to governance or public welfare.
Our Network
Reaffirming their commitment to unity and progress, the clan highlighted their respect for the Deputy Chief Minister’s leadership. They appreciated his wisdom and dedication to the betterment of society.
Background of the Issue
Earlier this week, Mr. Hayithung Bill Tungoe had openly challenged Deputy Chief Minister Y. Patton to a public debate on issues of governance and accountability. This development stirred widespread attention across Nagaland. The challenge, however, has now been rejected by his own clan, who has sought to distance themselves from what they call an individual-driven move rather than a collective concern.
Public Reactions on Social Media
The clarification has sparked mixed reactions online. Many users questioned the clan’s decision to publicly disown Mr. Tungoe’s actions, with some calling it unnecessary interference in a matter between a citizen and a political leader. Others criticized what they saw as favoritism towards politicians. They suggested that defending leaders in such a manner could damage democratic discourse. Also Read RANPO Defends Nagaland Deputy CM Y Patton
Some users argued that money and influence might have overshadowed the debate, while others sarcastically remarked that calling for an open debate should not be considered “immature.” At the same time, a section of the public expressed disappointment. They said that supporting political leaders at the expense of free discussion could bring negative consequences for future generations.
Overall, the social media response shows a divided opinion, with one side viewing the clan’s move as a step to preserve community harmony, while the other sees it as stifling accountability and open debate.
